![]() She claimed Ms Milligan should not be able to rely on evidence of her unlawful conduct to establish a beneficial interest in the home, and equity should prevent her from benefitting from her unlawful act. Ms Tinsley argued the legal title was in her sole name and the beneficial title should follow the legal title. Ms Milligan counterclaimed for a half share in the property. The relationship broke down and Ms Tinsley sought to evict Ms Milligan. The parties agreed they would be beneficial co-owners of the property but it was registered in Ms Tinsley’s sole name so as to allow Ms Milligan to make fraudulent claims for benefits with Ms Tinsley’s full knowledge and consent. They used the house as a lodging house and this joint business provided the bulk of their income. Ms Tinsley and Ms Milligan purchased a property in which to cohabit as a couple. Resulting trusts and illegality whether equitable interest may be claimed despite conduct. Share this: Facebook Twitter Reddit LinkedIn WhatsApp
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |